All's Not Well With Attwell
linesman, Steve coppell, Stuart Attwell, Tofik Bakhramov, Tranmere, Watford v RedaingThe bizarre happenings at Watford, where the visitors, Reading were awarded a goal when the ball was closer to the corner flag than the goal line. The video was on Youtube but seems to have been removed due to pressure from The Football League, and no doubt the referee, Stuart Attwell (aged 25) will be subject to sanctions whilst the FA and FL make money out of end of season blooper DVDs.
However, it is still here.
What I'm annoyed at is the fact that most of the flak appears to be directed at the young ref rather than the linesman (assistant referee/flag production manager). The Mirror, in its paper edition leads - albeit on page 25 - with ' He doesn't shoot...he scores anyway' and goes on to inform us that Attwell escaped the attention of the tabloid hounds and 'went on holiday.'
Online, Alistair Grant salivates, 'Calamity ref Stuart Attwell and his hapless sidekick Nigel Bannister will be carpeted by referees' chiefs after making one of the worst blunders in football history.'
Well, surely there's some fair play left in sport notwithstanding the high stakes? Ah, no this is professionalism. Remember that when you inadvertently touch the cue ball at pool and hope the opponent didn't notice; it is just the hallmark of a professional.
Steve Coppell, Reading manager, was quoted as saying that when playing cricket he was first to walk without waiting for the umpire's finger. I don't doubt Coppell's honesty. He was a true professional and I am privileged to have seen many of his games for Tranmere Rovers, before he was stolen by the behemoths of Manchester United. He has also suggested replaying the game.
As football fans we are biased; we should not be relied upon to be objective, in the same way as murder victims' families should not be on juries. Our tribal instincts take over. We cast a Nelson telescope to our rose-coloured spectacles and see no offside until we want to.
In 2000, the Mighty Whites of TRFC received a charitable donation from referee Rob Harris in our cup game with Sunderland. Having sent off Clint Hill (not a singular occurrence) we (ahem) forgot to bring off a player as we made a substitution. Did we complain about our breach of rules? No, we sat in the pub praying that John Aldridge would take legal counsel before giving his post-match interview.
Similarly, did the hosts of the 1966 World Cup and supporters demand the upholding of the English sense of fair play when the Azerbajhan (or Russian) linesman, Tofik Bakhramov signalled that Hurst had scored? Who now remembers the name of the Swiss referee?
They won't be erecting a statue for Attwell in his hometown of Nuneaton. Nor will they be doing the same for the actual linesman, Neil Bannister. If you're going to make a mistake, do it big.
Top of the league!
Luton, Tranmere
Tranmere Rovers 2 Luton Town 1
(Curran, Kay) (Furlong)
It may not last as teams like Orient play tomorrow. However, it is good to be top and this is one of the benefits of Friday Night matches at home. It is part of our heritage. I remember listening to a commentary on Radio Wales when we played Wrexham in the 80s. Not being able to understand the Welsh language I was glued to the speaker as I made out the odd word. Now and again you could make out...Ronnie Moore. Then one memorable phrase, 'Friday night is Prenton night'. This stuck with me. The passion that is sadly lacking in some home games, comes alive as the floodlights shine out.
Tonight's game was a case in point. We were not impressive for the whole game. Luton stole an early goal and were the team most likely in the early part of the second half.
My positivity is providing dividends. I have used my succubus powers to take away Noel Edmonds's life forces in order to ensure TRFC start winning games in the last 10 minutes. Whenever Deal or No Deal is on, I am able to use my negativity to produce the big money boxes. This is because anyone that gets to appear on this show is either deranged, a gambling addict, believer in fairies or has the time to be holed up with greedy people.
Anyway, it is wonderful to look down on our opponents, albeit for a short time. Leeds won again and have clearly reacted like a wounded beast as they continue to rise up the table. I thought they were somewhat fortunate to take all three points in the first game of the season at Prenton Park, but Wise seems to have channelled some of the energy of the anger about the points deduction into a united force. Maybe the bookies in Yorkshire are sweating a little. Leeds continue to court our star player Steve Davies. If they do manage to coax him, this will leave a sour taste in the mouth.
My camera phone pic from tonight.
Tranmere 0 Morecambe 1
football, Morecambe, TranmereThis is a cup for the hard of winning. We did reach the Final of its predecessor (Leyland DAF) in those heady days of the 1990s winning versus Bristol Rovers and losing an enthralling 3-2 encounter with Birmingham City. For those only accustomed to Premiership footie, this is for the teams in the bottom 2 divisions of the Football League (League 1 and League 2)
Morecambe are in their inaugural season in the Football League so this is our first meeting as League members.
We managed a 3-0 victory against Sammy McIlroy's men pre-season, but this was no guarantee of success. Tranny made a few changes from the normal line-up but Morecambe looked the hungrier of the two sides. Their cup fighting pedigree has already been established with victory against Wolves in the League Cup. Didn't we used to be giant killers?
I think the cliche about concentrating on the league is a little early this year. We still have the F.A. Cup but..........................
Yeovil 1 Tranmere 1
football, Tranmere, Yeovil Town

YEOVIL 1 TRANMERE 1
Rovers broke with tradition and blew my theory out of the water with a last gasp equaliser from a Steve Davies free kick. Davies remains a target for Leeds, who continued their good start to the season with a fourth straight win. They are still bottom of the league with -3 points but with Forest continuing to struggle, their quest for promotion dos not look impossible task it did after the points deduction. Rovers are now fifth but have some more difficult games ahead this month. We should have a greater appreciation of their potential by the end of September.
Guardian Gets It Wrong Shock
football, Tranmere, WBA
People often say to me 'Eric, it's all very well having a go at the Daily Mail, but that is like putting a bet on Jade Goody to win an Ugly Thicko competition. Well, today they have their day. I thought the following article in the sports section of The guardian was appalling. Not only is it pandering to the lowest common denominator but it is very lazy writing.
http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/sport/2007/08/29/chairman_blitz_hires_hughes.html
Chairman Blitz hires Hughes and kicks sensitivity into touch
Simon Blitz's claim that signing Lee Hughes was not a 'moral' decision is difficult to accept.
Lawrence Donegan
August 29, 2007 11:59 PM
Either the thespian community of these isles has a new Olivier in its midst or Lee Hughes, recently released from Featherstone prison into the promiscuous embrace of Oldham Athletic football club, really did mean it when he said this week that he would never forgive himself for the despicable conduct that caused the death of 56-year-old Douglas Graham in a car crash almost four years ago.
"I am not coming here [to Boundary Park and professional football] to be a hero," said Hughes, who served three years of a six-year sentence for causing death by dangerous driving and leaving the scene of an accident. He need have no worries on that score, at least not in the eyes of anyone who rightly judges that a man's ability to stick the ball in the net is a trivial thing in the greater scheme of life.
Nevertheless, Hughes's status as the principal pariah in an awful human tragedy may be under threat after the contribution of the Oldham chairman, Simon Blitz, who claimed this week that the decision to sign the player was absolutely not a "moral" decision. "For us it is a pure footballing matter," he went on.
Long experience has taught us not to expect too much in the way of good judgment from football club chairmen but this contribution from Blitz surely sets a new low.
Given that members of Graham's family had already publicly voiced their disgust at Hughes's return to professional football, the very least - or, rather, the very most - this buffoon should have said on the subject is nothing. That he said what he did, and that he said it on a day when he must surely have known that the emotions of the Graham family would be at their rawest, shows an absence of sensitivity, and a lack of respect, that could be interpreted as utter contempt.
As for the substance of Blitz's remarks, it would require us to accept that professional football is not bound by the same moral code as the rest of us. Of course, some within the game behave as if this is indeed the case, but it is not. And it most certainly is not the case if it means the feelings of a grieving family are overruled by the need for an English League One club to solve their goal - scoring problem. Are we being asked to believe that Hughes is the only available player in England capable of lifting the Boundary Park club out of their midtable torpor? And if other club chairmen embraced Blitz's approach and took it to its logical conclusion, where would we be ? Lee Harvey Oswald for Southampton? Mark Chapman for Chelsea?
The truth is that signing Hughes was absolutely a moral decision, but that Oldham and their chairman lacked the intellectual courage to defend it, probably because deep down they realised it was indefensible.
The player, reading a prepared statement, did say this on his own behalf: "I have served the sentence laid down by the law but nothing I can do or say can change what happened. I can only keep saying sorry although I know that is not good enough for some people." This is because "some people", though accepting the court's decision, happen to think three years is far too little for causing the death of another man in a car accident after a night out on the town and leaving the scene before the police arrived. It is because some people would argue that Hughes's debt to society would have been paid back in full if he spent the next four years - or however long his professional football career might have lasted - coaching football in the inner cities, or in another worthy capacity. Instead he has chosen to return to a full-time career in professional football, where his name on the Oldham team sheet will serve as a weekly reminder to the Graham family of their loss.
It is Hughes's right to make this choice, selfish though it may be, but it is Oldham's shame that they made it so easy for him to return to the game he has disgraced.
I once saw Lee Hughes play for West Brom, his home club against Tranmere at Prenton Park. After the match, we were astonished o see Hughes running away from the ground still in his WBA kit. It turns out that he had just learned of his father's heart attack and was getting a lift from fans as the team coach would not be leaving until later.
Nobody condones his actions. He killed a man. He injured another. However, the witch hunt which has grown since his release is irrational. I am, therefore, peeved that the Guardian allowed this populist nonsense to be printed. It is also disappointing because in the author's column in the paper edition, he makes an extremely good point in highlighting anti-Islam racist abuse in Scottish football.
The problem with the article can be summarised thus:
- Should our judicial system punish people harder because they have the capacity to earn money after serving their sentence?
- Should prisoners not be allowed to undergo rehabilitation?
- Should sentences be linked to career length? The article implies that Hughes should have to serve a further community penalty.
- It is crass to equate this crime with those of pre-meditated ones committed by Mark Chapman and Lee Harvey Oswald. Very bad journalism.
- The views of the victim's family are irrelevant. The law should not take them into account. If we were in that position we may feel different but the law must stand back from emotion lest justice judges one person's grief higher than another's.
- Hughes will be vilified by away fans when he plays for Oldham. (November 6th at Prenton Park).
Whilst it can be argued that the sentence was too lenient or that Hughes is symptomatic of a footballer with too much money, this article does neither. It is very, very lame. I was heartened to see that others commenting on the story felt the same. Hey, at least we can comment in The Guardian. Imagine trying to get a comment printed in the Daily Mail without wishing that Richard Litttlejohn was running the country. Oh, but I forget there is no bias. My friend told me.....
- Please be assured that there is no editorial policy in place that would seek to prevent the discussion of both sides of the story and we value comments from both perspectives.
Tranmere Rovers 2 Brighton 0
"Mathew Street Festival", football, Quiz, TranmereAnother welcome victory for the Mighty Whites and another strike by Chris Greenacre. Yet again my pet theory of Tranny goals in the last 10 minutes not resulting in a points increase compared to the converse, proves correct. Shuker's injury time lob over the stranded keeper ended any chance of a Brighton comeback, but was largely academic. The result takes us to the dizzy heights of 3rd place. Leeds continued on their march from the bottom of the hill with a decent victory at Forest.
Gillingham 0 Tranmere 2
Bundesliga, TranmereSTOCKPORT COUNTY 1 TRANMERE ROVERS 0
football, Tranmere

Another dis-spiriting defeat away to League 2 opponents. A goal in 85 minutes (my theory is being proven right again) means no lucrative run in the Carling Cup. Memories of our 2000 Wembley trip seem as distant as ever. "We shall concentrate on the League (and other cups)", says anonymous supporter, stage left.
Tranmere Rovers 1 Leeds United 2 (Boo hoo!)
Leeds, TranmereIn my Utopia there are many wonderful aspects. The major change though is that all football matches will be 80 minutes in duration as in Rugby. In this perfect world, Tranmere Rovers would be European Champions and Manchester United would be playing in the Salford Allotments and Parks League (Division 3). Yes, the season started yesterday and it was Groundhog Day as usual.
I think a study should be funded to prove this thesis. It is not that Tranmere do not score goals in the last 10 minutes, but that when they do, the goals do not have any value. For instance, scoring in this period when already winning does not result in a net gain. On the other hand, particularly last year, we conceded late goals when winning by the odd goal or drawing, thus losing points.
There were some positives from the game. We dominated periods of the first half and the two goals were conceded because of poor defending of set pieces. We deserved at least a point.
At least we still have a 12-point head start against Leeds following the decision to uphold the 15-point penalty. A very disappointing day, but it is still early days. We can still do well this season. There were signs in this game which give Leeds fans will be happy as they begin to make inroads into the points deduction. They need around 70 points to avoid relegation. This would be an uphill struggle for many clubs but I expect Leeds to achieve survival comfortably. However, they have little margin for error if they wish to reach the play-offs. Without the sanction, they would have been one of the two favourites for the title so automatic promotion back to The Championship was to be expected. The bookmakers will have done well on bets made before the Football League decision.
Leeds Update
football, Leeds, TranmereLeeds United will start the season with a 15 point deduction following the granting of the Golden Share by the Football League, enabling them to compete in League 1. The first game is against The Mighty Whites.
Poetry in Motion
Camus, Leeds, Tony Harrison, Tranmere, VAlbert Camus : "After many years during which I saw many things, what I know most surely about morality and the duty of man I owe to sport and learned it in the Racing Universitaire Algerios (football team)."
which is all very well, but when was the last time Algeria won the World Cup?
Football dominates today’s blog. The countdown to the new season has begun. I suffer from PMT (pre-match tension) and I haven’t been this nervous since I volunteered to be Salman Rushdie’s double.
Although the national media are only interested in the Premier League, the football season commences on 11th August. Tranmere has been handed an exciting first match against newly relegated and once mighty Leeds United. It seems unbelievable that a team of the stature and history of Leeds can find themselves in the third division. It is not so long ago that they were in the semi final of the European Champions League. They actually reached the final in 1975, losing to a strong Bayern Munich side.
There is still no confirmation that Leeds will be allowed to take part in the league as the Football League have retained the Golden Share, since the controversial take over by Ken Bates, after the club went into Administration. Assuming the game goes ahead, it is an interesting prospect and big test for Tranmere’s aspirations.
There has been a number of new signings made by the club. I have not been able to catch them during the pre-season friendlies but Tranmere was only beaten in one game (v Bolton).
Today’s poem is from Tony Harrison. His epic football-linked poem relates a story about him visiting his parents’ graves in Leeds, only to find it daubed with graffiti by Leeds United football supporters. It is very lengthy and contains strong language. However, I would argue that it is central to the theme of the piece. The poem was once performed on TV, when Channel 4 had an interest in culture rather than pandering to the Big Brother generation of morons.












